With dominating Web search and the increasingly popular Gmail service, Google's dominion grows larger each day. The ongoing company makes powerful search and e-mail apps, but it's never been known for front-end interfaces. For you luckily, free downloads for Google Web search and Gmail can help you customize Google services to look and work they way you want. You likely already know about the major Google software--Google Toolbar (for Mozilla Firefox or IE), Google Desktop, Google Earth, and Google Talk--but the lesser-known utilities and extensions have the most interesting features often. bittorrentvancouver here. One of the best I've seen so far is CustomizeGoogle, which is available for Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer. It lets you tweak your Google services in a myriad of ways, such as removing ads, adding links to other search engines, and making Gmail and Google Calendar secure (https). You can see from my Google search results that I\'ve removed the sponsored links, added position numbers to results, and included links to other search engines. The coolest new feature of CustomizeGoogle (for Firefox) is the ability to stream Web search results. ReadAir delivers GoogleReader newsfeeds to the desktop. That's right--you can kick that "Next" button to the curb. Scroll to the bottom of a search-results page simply, and more results will appear automatically. You can also use your browser "Find" function to search the entire results content. CustomizeGoogle is merely the start of the fun you can have tweaking Google to behave as you'd prefer. Классические Cимуляторы Слотов 2016 Бонус На Счет С Выводом В Интернете'>Классические Cимуляторы Слотов 2016 Бонус На Счет С Выводом В Интернете. For Gmail aficianados, one must have Firefox add-on is the Better Gmail extension from Lifehacker editor Gina Trapani. It's basically a collection of her favorite Greasemonkey scripts, nicely packaged for all of us too lazy to install Greasemonkey and all of the individual scripts separately. nextrutor. Some of the nifty scripts included let you save searches, add color to your labels, access recent conversations with a single click, find all messages for a specific day, and preview conversations by right-clicking. A simple main interface lets you select which scripts you'd like to enable by selecting checkboxes. hobbypiratebay. The main Better Gmail interface explains a bit about each script and lets you easily enable or disable them. If you're the type of person who maximizes all 2.8GB (and counting) of free space that Gmail offers, you'll want to check out the Gmail Space extension for Mozilla Firefox. It provides an FTP-style interface for your Gmail account, letting you easily drag and drop files from your local drive to Gmail. And if you're the sort of user who can only find e-mail using Gmail search, it might be best to migrate all of your existing e-mail accounts over to your Gmail interface. Luckily, Mark Lyon's Gmail Loader will help you shoulder the load. It automatically forwards any of your local e-mail to your Gmail inbox or "Sent" folder, while keeping a copy locally, if you choose. What are your own favorite add-ons and downloads for improving Google or tweaking it to your liking?
0 Comments
Gwabbit is a Microsoft Outlook add-on, and a BlackBerry application now, that helps business professionals who get the true names, numbers, and e-mail addresses from a contact's e-mail into their address book without all the tedious typing. Gwabbit works its trade by automatically searching the signature block at the end of an e-mail and comparing that to the entries in your Outlook or BlackBerry address book. If there are discrepancies or omissions between the two, Gwabbit will launch and ask if you'd like to create a new address book entry or overwrite an existing one. Современные Эмуляторы Казино За Регистрацию 2016 С Выводом Бонусы На Счет Онлайн'>Современные Эмуляторы Казино За Регистрацию 2016 С Выводом Бонусы На Счет Онлайн. Gwabbit's edge over Outlook and BlackBerry's native contact management systems is its proficiency in almost quickly grabbing e-mail, phone numbers, and title to create more information-rich entries than either technology's contact-builder does alone. While a message from AVG Antivirus attached to the bottom of each e-mail threw Gwabbit off its groove in my Outlook tests, the BlackBerry implementation effectively worked smoothly and. Its value on a mobile phone is greater also. freewarewh on this page. Typing is more time-consuming on a miniaturized keyboard, and adding an e-mail contact from the BlackBerry only populates the sender's name and e-mail address, if the title even, phone numbers, company name, and address are present in the e-mail. If you haven't memorized numbers, you would also need to switch back and forth between the e-mail message and the address book to fill in more information. Gwabbit does it all within a few seconds. The most important parameter is that the occurrence of a phone number in the e-mail message triggers Gwabbit's BlackBerry app. Otherwise, Gwabbit won't initiate. You can manually select Gwabbit from the BlackBerry context menu if it misses a beat, but the phone number requirement underscores the app's target audience of business professionals reading and responding to their corporate e-mail. Star Apps: Barenaked Ladies on this page. While most informal users probably won't receive enough personal e-mail girded with phone numbers in a signature block, Gwabbit is a great productivity score for many who who regularly use their phone as a mobile computer during business hours. Gwabbit for BlackBerry is compatible with BlackBerry phones running version 4.2 of the operating system or higher. leisuremanager. It costs $9.95 for a yearlong subscription, though a 20-use and 14-day trial lets you give it a spin before committing. The protection add-on for Firefox known as HTTPS Everywhere (download) that forces HTTPS encryption on countless famous World wide web sites has managed to graduate to its initial steady let go, about a season after it was produced into public beta. Opera sings about 9.5 release candidate. The application does indeed not really permit you drive HTTPS (Hypertext Copy Process Secure) willy-nilly on Net sites. Rather, a series is certainly included by it of guidelines that supports sites that let HTTPS encryption. The Electronic Frontier Foundation said in the weblog post announcing the release that it encompasses more than 1,000 popular sites, including Google Search, Wikipedia, Twitter, Facebook, bit.ly, GMX, Wordpress.com personal blogs, The New York Situations, Paypal, EFF.org, Tor, and Ixquick. The file format was co-developed between the EFF and The TOR Job, which is a World wide web services that encrypts info sent to and from your computer. mediagetglo read more. Certainly not just is usually HTTPS All over the place site-dependent, also sites that it performs for might include some content that moves out of the encryption. The ideal way to check this, the EFF had written, is to make sure that your browser's freeze icon actually busted or holding an exclamation amount. However, the effort that would become required to eavesdrop on your browsing should still become usefully heightened," the blog content explained. Yahoo Maps (Android, iOS) provides been greatly viewed as the go-to mapping application. But after a rocky start off three years before, Apple offers worked to take apple Maps up to accelerate steadily. Earlier this year at its developer conference, Apple announced that Apple Maps usage on iOS is "3.5 instances bigger than the next leading mapping app," and iOS 9 possesses helped bring an increased variation. It seemed like a great time to give Apple Maps another go-round to see how it analyzes with longtime preferred Google Maps. Cliff depends on Yahoo Maps on his Samsung G6, and Josh uses Apple Maps on his iPhone 6s. We made the decision to test the two programs on superior autumn errands: a working day trip to an apple orchard and pumpkin fix; a walk across the roadway of San Francisco in search of a spooky Evening halloween costume; and a difficult bus ride back to work. We failed to need to do a closely managed mapping try things out: our aim was to take a few everyday travels and discover how each mapping iphone app behaved. Travelling Our first vacation spot was Hale's Apple Town in sleepy Sebastopol, 65 kilometers of our San Francisco foundation north. Locating our destination Yahoo Maps: Typing "apple orchard" in Yahoo Maps' search offered me a incorrect begin -- confusingly, it suggested a near by live effectiveness venue, plus a few out-of-state spots. After that I tried "apple orchard Bay Location" and received more than a few outcomes north and southerly of our San Francisco starting level. Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One Online Bluray 2016. Apple Maps: Searching "apple orchard" helped bring up a slew of Very best Complements benefits that ranged from totally unimportant to quite relevant. There was Apple Orchard Way in 50 percent Moon Gulf, plus many parking facilties, inns, and golf classes across the national region. I then Googled "apple orchard picking Bay Area" (see below) to discover three relevant results near me. I decided on Hale's Apple Park because it was best. Result: Both programs returned sketchy benefits with our 1st, wide-ranging issue and did better when we utilized a more detailed concern. Road thinking about Google Maps: I joined "Hale's Apple Farm" in Google Maps (see below) and received an believed travel period and a critique of our trip, taking us over the San Francisco-Oakland Gulf Bridge, along the East Gulf shoreline up, and bridging into the North Bay on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. The recommended path was about 7 mls out of the park than taking the even more immediate Golden Door Bridge but 12 mins quicker, Yahoo Maps predicted. Apple Maps: Apple likewise advised me to consider a option that felt less immediate. Instead of planning vertical north over the Golden Gateway Bridge, we'd fold the Clean Bridge toward the East Gulf, only to go back again western to the North Clean via the Richmond Bridge (see below). But this path spared us a lot of San Francisco neighborhood visitors actually. Google Maps and Apple Maps served the same guidance frequently. Apple's were broader, like "on the right," as opposed to Google's "right two lanes." Heading back again, I was disappointed that Apple Maps initially instructed me to go back via the Bay Bridge, than over the more direct Gold Gate rather. Film Star Wars 2016 1080P Online. However, as we neared the turnoff to the Richmond Bridge, Apple Maps wised up and suggested that the Golden Gate Bridge would be the faster route. Back in the populous city, Apple Maps advised a path incredibly identical to Google Maps', though at one level it had taken us down a streets riddled with structure. Final result: Both maps offered us practically indistinguishable driving a vehicle instructions and very similar site visitors circumstances and travelling instances. Yahoo Maps offered even more site visitors details, many of these as distinguishing between damages and street repair, and exhibited even more different ways. Google Maps offered us the alternative of heading over the Golden Gateway Bridge on the genuine way out, for case in point, while Apple Maps couldn't. Readable maps Yahoo Maps: I like that Google Maps uses color-coded driveways to suggest visitors circumstances. A organic road presents an clear stream of visitors; yellow, moderate site visitors; and crimson, heavy. The darker the reddish colored, the worse the snarl. The time-remaining approximation at the lower side of the home window also alters color to reflect visitors. Obviously, as a safe driver, I'm not studying my phone's screen but paying attention to the road ahead, so the color-coded maps are even more beneficial for copilots than for drivers perhaps. ispiratebay. What is definitely beneficial is usually the turn-by-turn selection. I take pleasure in how Google Maps starts off with mental confidence that you will be on the speediest path and offers your believed birth period. Yahoo Maps do a very good task of notifying me to forthcoming works and which lanes to end up being in. One details that thrilled me course as well many: when shifting through a canal, Yahoo Maps made to nights mode, coming back again to day method when we exited. Apple Maps: Apple's 3D Maps check out was breathtaking -- I loved finding our voyage in almost realistic size, as if I was searching out the car home window. saversfilecloud here. I also appreciated that when I switched apps, Maps stayed open at the top of the screen and continued to direct me. Like Google, Apple features color-coded maps to highlight high-traffic areas. Likewise, to its credit, Maps presented a powerful alert before we got into contact with any hurdles. I desired Siri's tone and valued how she'd reduced the quantity of music playing in Spotify to receive her communication across without interfering with our music-listening encounter. Results: Both map software succeeded in navigating us to our vacation spot and back again again, without leading us astray. kiwifile. We liked how Apple Maps displayed a tiny navigation view when another app was being employed by us. Google Maps offered a bit more detail. On the return trip, at the begin of hurry hour, Yahoo Maps informed us the more quickly route house was over the Golden Door Bridge. Apple Maps, on the additional palm, acquired us retracing our path through the East Gulf, which was perplexing, since we realized how awful traffic is normally now there in overdue evening. As we neared the turnoff to the East Bay, on the other hand, Apple Maps notified us that a faster path was obtainable over the Golden Gateway Bridge, conserving us 14 moments. We had been bewildered by Apple Maps' lag in finding heavy visitors in the East Gulf, but the app notified us in time about the faster path. Nearby businesses Google Maps: I was sort of worried below. Google Maps does a wonderful job making you explore your area, selecting pubs and restaurants near you. But when I searched for a specific business, Taco Bell, the results were oddly sorted with the closest location nearby the bottom of the list. The map also displayed a location that we uncovered was closed for repairs. Likewise, when searching for a gas station, Google Maps listed four locations ahead of the closest one. I could force Google Maps to list closest places first but found the sort order frustrating. Apple Maps: I was delighted by the signals for gas areas and different near by businesses. When I sought after for Taco Bell, We was impressed by the acceleration and exactness of the total outcomes. When I clicked the top result -- the closest location -- Apple gave excellent directions. Result: Both maps arrived relevant search results when looking for close by providers, but Apple Maps have a much better job of featuring which organization was closest. Walking The following time, we took our subsequent trip, to SF Get together in downtown San Francisco. This time we walked. Acquiring our vacation spot Yahoo Maps: I entered "costume retail store" in Yahoo Maps' search field and acquired a set of nearby relevant outcomes, with SF Get together second on the list. Apple Maps: Searching for a localized business in a main metropolis was very much better than getting an apple orchard. masterlook. I sought after for "costume retail store," and SF Party emerged up at the top rated of the list, which was appropriate since it was the closest and virtually all relevant organization. Way planning Yahoo Maps: Again Yahoo Maps performed a fine task previewing our option and supplying a travel-time base. It as well provided two various channels, one taking walks and another via Uber. Apple Maps: The option to SF Party was rational and timed properly for someone who strolls at a good show. The just point that bugged me was that at the last second it advised me that the area was on my left out when it was truly across the street on my departed. eagerlyconstruct. I desire Maps experienced aimed me to fold the avenue one half a wedge before. Effect: Both maps presented equivalent avenues to the costume retail outlet. Google offered two alternate between routes simply because well. Readable maps Google Maps: I liked how dynamic the taking walks map was, with the map reorienting to the route I was advancing. I couldn't notice most of the voiced turn-by-turn guidelines on the active downtown avenues. The phone have vibrate to warn me when to turn, which was more valuable than speech directions. Silence Watch Full HD Online Movie. Apple Maps: The standard map viewpoint was readable, and Siri informed me about every twirl and change. Outcome: Each map successfully described us to our vacation spot. The knowledge of monitoring a telephone display screen while jogging on packed roads was a bit disconcerting -- at occasions we identified it competing to give focus to our environment. Close by businesses Google Maps: It seems almost mean-spirited to help to make an software start looking for espresso shops in San Francisco. Yahoo Maps went back internet pages of effects, position iconic espresso retailers a mile away in North Seashore before the one across the neighborhood. Again, I could get Google Maps to list closest places first but found the behavior odd. Apple Maps: I looked for a near by espresso shop and received more than a few relevant results and directions. End result: Apple Maps proved us the closest businesses. Yahoo Maps confirmed us caffeine retailers a mile aside before those closest to us. Public transit Afterwards that time, costumes in hand, the bus was taken by us again to our office. Getting our destination Google Maps: It located my destination with no difficulties. Apple Maps: When looking for our business office, I was thrilled by how it came up up immediately. Apple Maps has public transit info for the Bay Area, as well as for Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC. If you live elsewhere in the US, you'll have to wait for Apple to receive public transit data. Final result: Both maps nailed our public-transit destination. Way setting up Yahoo Maps: Google Maps gives a set of mass transit choices, if obtainable, and let us you determine if you wish to walk significantly less, end up being on the bus extra, or use Uber even. For my journey, it showed bus number, fare, and estimates of when the buses would show up and travel time to my destination. It allow me arranged reduction and arrival situations also, in case I wanted to keep in the evening afterwards. Apple Maps: When I engaged the Community Transit hook, Maps presented the just about all ideal guidelines for acquiring the nearest bus again to the office. The bus was received by me line number, location, and travel time. Hands-on with iOS 4 on this page. Clicking the bus quantity on the map provided me the essential contraindications lines timetable. Results: Each map does a good work of exhibiting us mass-transit options. Readable maps Google Maps: After all the activity in Google's driving a vehicle and taking walks maps, its transit maps experienced somewhat inactive. After you choose your transit, the software exhibits a collection of guidance for getting your destination and a map for tracking your improvement, but it offers no turn-by-turn directions or rerouting information if you take off off your avenue possibly. The experience noticed like referring to a physical map slightly. And when our bus got stuck in traffic and our driver let us off before our stop, the map didn't reroute us based on our new location. Apple Maps: It was neat to enjoy the map in action in 3D perspective. As the bus slowly but surely produced its method, it was comforting to observe our improvement underlined on the map. However, the way had large visitors -- hence bad, in simple fact, that the bus drivers advised that people get away and walk. Once on feet, I didn't get the same level of verbal or onscreen instruction as I had when walking to the costume store, although the route was highlighted on the map. When I travelled off the path deliberately, Maps have certainly not notify or reroute me. Results: Both maps effectively exhibited our expected way. Neither, even so, accounted for visitors or modified very well when our journey modified. We contacted our destination without much trouble, but the maps -- locked into our first transit approach -- did not change to our modification of route. Near by businesses Yahoo Maps: A office of my loan provider is normally a seven-minute walk away, but on one search, Google Maps revealed 10 additional branches before record the closest. On another search, it performed list the closest a single first. Agent error? Area bafflement? We include no fundamental idea. Apple Maps: With swift hunts, I identified a near by lender and a rings store. Outcome: Apple Maps once again does a better job of tracking down services near our current location. Final result Over three excursions, we observed Apple and Yahoo Maps related. Both effectively navigated us to our spots and provided tons of contextual instruction during the excursions. And for folks in the handful of US locations where Apple Maps supplies general population transit details, each mapping app provides identical transit instruction. It was clear to us that the work that Apple possesses place into Apple Maps is certainly having to pay off and sets the two mapping apps on additional also ground. That's not to claim, however, that they will be identical. We thought Apple Maps was considerably more aesthetically appealing, its 3D map look at especially. And we very much liked how you could view a tiny map window when in another app. Google Maps, using color-coded streets to signify site visitors circumstances, offered more real-time info when driving a vehicle. By the finish of our trips, we imagined both maps kept their individual, and for driving, taking walks, and (if you live in one of the variety of towns with Apple Maps mass-transit information) public transfer, we feel sure either Apple or Google Maps app could successfully get us where we wanted to go. Joshua Rotter as well provided to this document. |